Search results for "Frankfurt cases"

showing 3 items of 3 documents

On the Very Idea of a Robust Alternative

2011

According to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP), an agent is morally responsible for an action of hers only if she could have done otherwise. The notion of a robust alternative plays a prominent role in recent attacks on PAP based on so-called Frankfurt cases. In this paper I defend the truth of PAP for blameworthy actions against Frankfurt cases recently proposed by Derk Pereboom and David Widerker. My defence rests on some intuitively plausible principles that yield a new understanding of the concept of a robust alternative. I will leave aside whether PAP also holds for praiseworthy actions.

PhilosophyAction (philosophy)AsideIf and only ifPhilosophyMoral responsibilityFrankfurt casesEpistemologyCrítica (México D. F. En línea)
researchProduct

Doing One’s Best, Alternative Possibilities, and Blameworthiness

2014

En este trabajo me propongo principalmente mejorar y dar un apoyo mas firme a una defensa del Principio de Posibilidades Alternativas (PPA) frente a los casos Frankfurt que propuse en trabajos anteriores. En el presente articulo concentro mi atencion en un reciente y famoso caso Frankfurt, �Evasion de impuestos�, disenado por Derk Pereboom. Tras presentar los aspectos esenciales de mi defensa del PPA y aplicarlos al caso de Pereboom, considero distintas objeciones que han sido (o podrian ser) planteadas a dicha defensa y sostengo que no tienen exito. Concluyo senalando que mi critica al ejemplo de Pereboom sugiere una estrategia general contra otros casos Frankfurt, tanto posibles como efec…

PhilosophyInjury controlAccident preventionPhilosophyPoison controlFrankfurt casesHumanitiesCrítica (México D. F. En línea)
researchProduct

Frankfurtian Reflections: A Critical Discussion of Robert Lockie’s “Three Recent Frankfurt Cases”

2016

In a recent article, Robert Lockie brings about a critical examination of three Frankfurtstyle cases designed by David Widerker and Derk Pereboom. His conclusion is that these cases do not refute either the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP) or some cognate leeway principle for moral responsibility. Though I take the conclusion to be true, I contend that Lockie's arguments do not succeed in showing it. I concentrate on Pereboom's Tax Evasion 2 . After presenting Pereboom's example and analyzing its structure, I distinguish two strategies of Lockie's to defend PAP against it, which I call 'No True Alternative Decision' (NTAD) and 'No Responsibility' (NR), respectively. According to…

Structure (mathematical logic)Philosophy of mindPhilosophy of sciencePhilosophy05 social sciences06 humanities and the arts0603 philosophy ethics and religion050105 experimental psychologyCritical discussionEpistemologyPhilosophy of languagePhilosophy060302 philosophy0501 psychology and cognitive sciencesMoral responsibilityFrankfurt casesConsciència (Moral)CounterexampleLaw and economicsPhilosophia
researchProduct